In English spoken west of the
Democrats are expressing growing alarm about President Obama’s re-election prospects and, in interviews, are openly acknowledging anxiety about the White House’s ability to strengthen the president’s standing over the next 14 months.
Elected officials and party leaders at all levels said their worries have intensified as the economy has displayed new signs of weakness. They said the likelihood of a highly competitive 2012 race is increasing as the Republican field, once dismissed by many Democrats as too inexperienced and conservative to pose a serious threat, has started narrowing to two leading candidates, Mitt Romney and Rick Perry, who have executive experience and messages built around job creation.
Democrats have been deluding themselves in the past nine months that the massive losses they took in 2010 were just a fluke. The race for Weiner’s Brooklyn/Queens seat is proving them wrong. There, the central issue is Obama himself because of his treatment of
. Polls are now trending to the Republican candidate, and even if the Democrat manages to hold it, it would be a humbling win. The district is a 2 to 1 Democratic and heavily Jewish, one that would normally go at least 60/40 in their favor. Democrats are very vulnerable especially in the Senate next year, where 23 seats they own or control are up for grabs, versus 10 for Republicans. Israel
While the Times bemoans the threat Obama presents to the party next year, it doesn’t say how to get to there from here. That is, who tells Obama he should step aside? Bill Clinton? No way, with the presumptive candidate his wife. Jimmy Carter? Give me a break! For good or bad, Democrats will have to stick with their man.
Republicans could create a little mischief if they wanted. And that would be to convince either Rasmussen or Gallup to do public polling of Democrats to see who would be the best nominee, Hillary or Obama. And keep doing it each month.
Now that would cause ruckus!